It's not easy being omniscient. When I set out to write a
book, I know a lot about my characters and their baggage. From the very first
line of the book, I know what secrets my hero and heroine are hiding from each
other, and I know how these secrets shape their biases and interactions. I also
know that I have to thread their secrets carefully into the narrative, slowly
unraveling them rather than committing the dreaded Info Dump. Dumping
information will slow down my narrative, after all, and discourage a reader
from continuing with the story. Why read on if you know what's going to happen?
But Info Dumps aren't just bad form because they slow
pacing. They're bad form because they're not realistic. They're socially weird,
like that person you barely know who tells you about her embarrassing medical
problem. I don't want to learn about anyone's gynecological history while
standing in line for coffee, and my readers don't want to know in chapter one
that my heroine really does want to fall in love, deep down, but fears
rejection after her fiancé jumped into bed with another woman days before the
wedding. That's all too much information for a first meeting.
Besides, let's get real: do any of us know, I mean really
know, why we behave the way we do? Don't most of us react first and analyze
later? To get a better perspective on my current work in progress, I started thinking about what I might look like as a romance heroine and how my backstory might read. My youngest brother is a childhood cancer
survivor, and going through that experience with him has changed my life. His
cancer was suspected of being environmental, so it's the reason I became a
lawyer and now work in the public interest. It's the reason I ran two marathons
and write even when I don't want to, because I saw my healthy, athletic
brother's life change in an instant and I know I only have today. I'm sure
that experience of visiting the children's cancer wing of the hospital—of seeing
infants with tubes in them and hearing about a child my brother's age dying in
the room next door—I'm sure that has affected me in ways I don't understand.
It's colored my entire worldview and changed who I am. But I would never tell
anyone about it unless it was relevant. It's simply too much information for a
first chapter or a coffee line.
So let's go to my current work in progress, where I have a
heroine who is genuinely warm, engaging and sensitive at her best and
melodramatic and haughty at her worst. She is also fiercely independent, which
can be either good or bad. Upon first meeting, my commitment phobic heroine may
not consciously be aware of why she
viscerally hates the hero. Rather, she will throw up defensive rationales that
correspond with her worst tendencies: he's invading her territory, he's
threatening her happiness, he's hurt her in the past and he's a big fat jerk. But
then hero surprises her by being decent and by revealing a little bit of
himself that changes her impression. When her initial theory of him fails, she
is forced to look inward and to figure out how she could have been so wrong. This
is when she realizes that she is very attracted to hero. All of her other knee-jerk
reactions—he's a jerk, he's on my turf, etc.—protected her from having to deal
with the real pain he stirred up: she is attracted to him, but her fiancé
cheated and she doesn't want to be hurt again. That's the core of her pain, but
it's not something that comes out until later in the book.
My point is that our real life baggage affects us in ways we
don't always understand, and our responses as a result of that baggage are not
always logical and orderly. People are complicated. The challenge of writing
compelling characters is to make them human: to bring them on a journey in
which they will come to understand their own history and how it has prevented
them from being their best selves. Just as we don't always understand our
responses to situations and people, our characters shouldn't, either. That's what will make them fascinating and wonderful and, ultimately, people we want to spend
more time getting to know.
Very insightful post, Natalie! I especially like the comment that people tend to respond first, analyze later. Thanks so much for sharing!
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad you found it helpful! :-)
DeleteNo wonder you're the person you are, Natalie! I understand exactly what you mean about the colouring your worldview and changing who you are - or sometimes it just brings out the real you. This was a really thought-provoking post. I got a lot out of it. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteSo happy you enjoyed it! And I'm sure that my self-understanding only goes so deep. I suspect others might provide even more insight. ;-)
DeleteGreat post! I so agree that our past experiences change and color our view of the world. And it's very interesting to see how it plays out for our characters. Thanks for sharing! :-)
ReplyDeleteWe are shaped by our experiences to a large extent, and maybe more than we realize. I think it's the same for our characters. At least, that's my theory. :-)
Delete